Political science professor Thom Yantek compares much of what he sees with the Iraq situation to public opinion and politics during the Vietnam conflict.
“Go back 30 years to Vietnam. American troops were being spit upon,” Yantek says. “We’ve had a lot of time to reflect. Now we want to support our troops.”
Yantek says it took several years for opposition to Vietnam to become mainstream. But now, opposition to the occupation in Iraq has grown more quickly. It is “interesting that already opinion is softening” in favor of the Iraqi point of view, he says.
“What is really troubling to a number of critics,” he says, “is that we might have been misled. At least the immediacy of the situation has been exaggerated this time.”
The political environment now has changed as Americans, and others, are doubting the true motives behind invading Iraq, he says.
Americans may be taking a closer look at the current situation because of Vietnam’s impact.
“This time there are more arguments,” Yantek says. “The U.S. unilaterally invaded a sovereign nation. It broke international law.”
Yantek says America has a “moral center” that allows us to look at the world as though we have a moral sanctity over other nations, which makes us feel justified in wielding power against other nations.
|